amanuensis1: (Default)
Little bit of meta here, my take on one question posed by the Spinner's End chapter of HBP: did Snape indeed know what Draco's task was when he claimed to Bellatrix and Narcissa he did? Here's what Snape says:

"It so happens that I know of the plan," he said in a low voice. "I am one of the few the Dark Lord has told."

Some readers have speculated that he might not have, that he was bluffing. If that's so, that means he didn't know exactly what he was signing up for when he agreed to make the Unbreakable Vow. Why would Snape have taken such a risk? Possibly because he didn't know Draco's task and figured he darn well needed to know what Voldemort was plotting, so, by telling Narcissa "It's all right, you can speak freely with me," he'd have the chance to find out something crucial.

I don't see anything in that chapter that directly contradicts that idea; Snape's hesitation before he says the last words of the vow could also be said to support it. Perhaps he hesitates because he has no idea what he's promising, but knows he can't back out at that point without having his bluff called. However, one can also explain the hesitation if Snape does know that Draco's been directed to kill Dumbledore, because Snape would realize that by doing so, he's signed his own death warrant, since he's thinking there's no way he'll carry it through.

I'm more inclined to think that Snape does actually know, even though we have no hard-and-fast evidence. What we do have, though, is what can be seen as a clean example of an author's contrivance to keep the knowledge from the reader, by shrouding the element in "we must not speak of it, the Dark Lord has commanded," and "I already know of the plan." Keeps the reader in the dark. And that's all the explanation you'd need, as to why he says that. I think that's the most compelling element to sway me in that direction. But I do think that the chapter, and all the rest of the text, can support either hypothesis.
amanuensis1: (Default)
You know, even if I'd arrived at that fandom love meme in time to respond to the comments individually, I couldn't've. Wouldn't've been able to. There is only so much praise that one can hear about oneself without being reduced to alsdjkfalsjfal;ffka;sl brain go SPLODEY, okay? It's like the Arc of the Covenant or something; you shouldn't look because it's so beautiful it'll kill ya. At the least it'll swell your head until you're at risk of believing you're actually hot stuff, which is, yeesh, ever so dangerous.

Everyone who left such turboblushingly wonderful comments--don't be put off my flip tone. I read them, I "eep!"'ed, I had to hide my face in my hands. I saved the page so that I can go back to them when I'm having a tough day. Oh, yes. But I don't think I can ever express my thanks individually. Words wouldn't be enough and I'd dissolve in a puddle before I could get them out. I heart all of you intensely.

****

Regarding the "interview" I posted a few days back, as I said to a number of responders, it's not precisely what I believe is in JKR's head, nor am I trying to communicate that it's how I've always felt about the Harry/Ginny romance in the book. Rather, it's my most positive spin on the handling of the romance, one that can make me say, "Ah. Well, if that's what was intended, I understand. I may not have preferred it, but I understand." I'm one of those guilty people that I cited, wanting any romance Harry embarks on to have deep significance, and feeling that the romance between Harry and Ginny lacked that. Perhaps JKR thinks it did have deep significance, and perhaps she plans to bring them back together at the conclusion of Book 7. Perhaps she agrees with the "interview" position I posed, that they were meant to be a sweet teenage hormonal romp and nothing epic. I think if it were the latter, though, and if she had explained it like that in her post-HBP interview, the number of readers dissatisfied with the way the romance was executed--not only H/Hr 'shippers but a significant number of H/G 'shippers plus a good chunk of people who hadn't cared in the first place--might have been appeased.
amanuensis1: (Default)
What will my reaction be to Half-Blood Prince after the last book?

I still feel like the series peaked at OotP for me. Every volume has felt better than the last except for this last one--I'm still wigged that anyone, Rowling included, believes that Snape's motives are ambiguous, justifying leaving Harry in suspense at the conclusion of this book. I found Harry and Dumbledore's pensieve jaunts puzzlingly expository, and was waiting--am still waiting--to find out what was going on during those. Tom Riddle's history could have been related in two pages; what the heck happened in those pensieve jaunts that made them so crucial? I want there to have been more motivation on Dumbledore's part than exposition, or the idea that Harry had to see those moments for himself to gain understanding of Voldemort and of himself. It's not enough.

I loved the main plot of the book, the main plot being the Half-Blood Prince. Did I know who it was? Hell, no. The concept that "Prince" was a last name never crossed my mind--even when Hermione brought it up I couldn't see how that fit in. I didn't get it until I saw the chapter title "Flight of the Prince."

But I still believed that Slughorn gave him that book deliberately. Bah.

Will the last book draw it all back together for me? Will those unanswered questions finally fall into place? Or will I be happier admitting that HBP was the weak moment in the series for me and let it be?

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 09:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios