![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I fell and fell hard, and a lot of you did too--what was it about Avengers that made it a Fandom Global Event? For the definition of that term and some speculation why it happened, check out
fabularasa's blogspot post, A Unified Theory of Fandom. Agree, disagree, discuss.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 01:46 pm (UTC)And I'm not yet convinced Avengers will become a FGE. At this point it feels just like it did with Merlin and Inception--a lot of people are all excited and it's brand new and inspiring, but I don't see signs that it's going to last any longer than any other fandom that comes and goes. Maybe there will be renewed bursts whenever a new film in the series is released. But I don't think there's enough, in the movie at least, to sustain interest indefinitely for years and years like HP or Buffy or Stark Trek or whatever.
Maybe a bunch of people who saw the films will start reading the comic books and that will sustain it between films? I'm not sure it's the same audience, though.
And of course I'm speaking as someone who saw the film, thought FUN, and then forgot about it before I left the cinema, I have to admit. (I really, really wish I found Jeremy Renner even slightly attractive, I'd so be all over your fics.)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 02:47 pm (UTC)Only I'm struggling, honestly. Lord of the Rings, maybe? All my fandoms SEEM like FGEs, but that's because I'm in them, you know?
I disagree with her about Supernatural, though. It's not an FGE, but I think it's not because it's quite dark a lot of the time, and not in a 'there'll be a happy ending eventually' kind of way. Not because it's not clever.
Spn fangirl can't you tell?no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-19 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-18 09:21 pm (UTC)The other obvious example is X-Files, though perhaps it's not as obvious for people who weren't there. It also built its popularity over several years, and rode its way to massiveness on a forum that was new to most people -- the internet itself. The internet itself was much smaller back then, but in terms of saturation, XF fandom was where HP has been, and where Avengers is now. I started going online BECAUSE of that show, and so did many of my RL friends. Looking at that blog post, XF had cleverness and magic in spades, but it did not have a large cast of characters, nor was it male-focused -- on the contrary, it had one of the most widely beloved and widely ficced-about female leads in any fandom ever... if you like het, of course. XF slash, like most slash fandoms, was of course focused on the manpain of pretty white guys, which is a thing about fandom that has always left me very underwhelmed, and continues to do so.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-20 12:33 am (UTC)And you're right, it's hard to make generalizations when there has only even been one real mega-fandom that ate the universe. My points are facile and easily perforated, but I like to poke at things, and Avengers, and the force with which it hit (at least in my corner of fandom) has really surprised me. I myself am both facile and easily perforated, so feel free to poke back.
Does this mean I am going to have to figure out how Tumblr works?
no subject
Date: 2012-06-19 08:56 pm (UTC)