![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Some discussion regarding Torchwood C of E and some cold facts regarding narrative structure/resolution:
1. If you're going to end Torchwood (the organization as well as the series), killing three-fifths of the team and making the leader leave Earth works.
2. Jack reneging on "An injury to one is an injury to all" is bitterly, bitterly unpopular. Unfortunately, Jack has had moments when he didn't exactly stick to this credo, so it's not completely out of character. It's damned unfair, and it really couldn't be crueler to have put him in the situation to make that particular sacrifice, but at least the writers recognized that that's really it for Jack. He can't stay here any longer after a decision like that. He's no longer our hero. He can't die, so at the least he has to leave Earth.
(Mind, I don't like that choice. It was a very mean thing to do, to take away the Jack-as-hero perception. I can't argue the structure of it, but I will argue that it sours the audience. An audience might grieve and that is the way of sad events in a story, but souring the audience is a risky choice.)
3. Watching the politicians of Earth turn into genocidal maniacs was brilliant, but I'm sorry, that demands an ending far more devastating for the majority of them. Not all of them could/would/should get Frobisher's ending, but we really needed to see more death/imprisonment/suicide/abject public stoning of these characters.
4. Similarly, when the world has gone stark staring genocidal you can't gloss over that with a "Six months later." I think the descent into hell that this miniseries depicted was fabulous but the world would be irreparably scarred if it could come back at all from a devastation like that. Children ripped from their parents' arms by their own government. Chaos and anarchy, guys. Riots in the streets. Not "Six months later."
You can hate the deaths, you can hate what they did to our Captain Jack Harkness, but as for me I'm vilifying them for dropping the ball on the resolution. Which is a serious pity, since most of it was tight and horrifying and brilliant. Bad writers, no denouement biscuit.
1. If you're going to end Torchwood (the organization as well as the series), killing three-fifths of the team and making the leader leave Earth works.
2. Jack reneging on "An injury to one is an injury to all" is bitterly, bitterly unpopular. Unfortunately, Jack has had moments when he didn't exactly stick to this credo, so it's not completely out of character. It's damned unfair, and it really couldn't be crueler to have put him in the situation to make that particular sacrifice, but at least the writers recognized that that's really it for Jack. He can't stay here any longer after a decision like that. He's no longer our hero. He can't die, so at the least he has to leave Earth.
(Mind, I don't like that choice. It was a very mean thing to do, to take away the Jack-as-hero perception. I can't argue the structure of it, but I will argue that it sours the audience. An audience might grieve and that is the way of sad events in a story, but souring the audience is a risky choice.)
3. Watching the politicians of Earth turn into genocidal maniacs was brilliant, but I'm sorry, that demands an ending far more devastating for the majority of them. Not all of them could/would/should get Frobisher's ending, but we really needed to see more death/imprisonment/suicide/abject public stoning of these characters.
4. Similarly, when the world has gone stark staring genocidal you can't gloss over that with a "Six months later." I think the descent into hell that this miniseries depicted was fabulous but the world would be irreparably scarred if it could come back at all from a devastation like that. Children ripped from their parents' arms by their own government. Chaos and anarchy, guys. Riots in the streets. Not "Six months later."
You can hate the deaths, you can hate what they did to our Captain Jack Harkness, but as for me I'm vilifying them for dropping the ball on the resolution. Which is a serious pity, since most of it was tight and horrifying and brilliant. Bad writers, no denouement biscuit.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 12:47 am (UTC)In this story, the 456 could have been dealt with differently if the government had not tried to hide what had happened back in 1965, that would have bought them more time. Jack solved the 'problem' of how to deal with the 456 fairly easily, how much easier would it have been for the world's techies to work on this. The clues were there, the whole thing about wavelengths, the children being used for amplification etc. with more time, things might have been very different. The Prime Minister is even called 'Green', surely a nod to our deeply, deeply unpopular Prime Minister.
Good Sci-Fi works best when it is used as a lens to view our own society, this is what I think they were doing with Torchwood. It was flawed, it was deeply distressing and I can't see how the show could continue, it shouldn't continue after that, at least not in this form.
Lucie
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:12 am (UTC)And as an attack on government, I thought how well it could extend to any government. Obviously I'm not as close to this portrayal as someone from the UK is, but it felt like it could have been a conference table in the White House as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:31 am (UTC)Is this why I feel... I'm not sure what I feel. Some kind of unrest. I thought the whole series was amazing, and dark, wow was it dark, but I feel like... I needed something more? I hadn't realised it, but you're right, I wanted to see more of the fallout, it ended kind of abruptly.
About the politicians, I'll be cynical and say that IRL politicians would probably have found a way to save their asses. But yes, stories should follow story rules and give some kind of closure. My need to see some justice wasn't exactly satisfied.
Still, wow. And phew, that was freaking intense. God, I can't even go back to sleep now. (I woke up just to see the last episode because I couldn't wait till tomorrow - how crazy am I?)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:51 am (UTC)And it's reasonable to think a lot of the politicians would have got away scot-free but, oh, there would have been scapegoats thrown to the wolves and they would have been EATEN ALIVE. Jail. Shamesuicides. All that. I really needed to see that.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:35 am (UTC)But hey...I'm not the writers, right? I would have been happy with a Doctor guest appearance at the end to talk about the consequences of what had happened....After-school special like.
And I guess thats why they didn't....cuz they be still awesome. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 03:55 am (UTC)THIS. Yes. The government would have fucking collapsed, and that would have been pretty interesting. They had way too much to cram into the last episode, so they cut corners where it needed to count the most. And the technobabbly solution - WTF, that was it? Just Jack typing a few things on a computer? Really?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 05:05 am (UTC)I would have preferred to have the grand reveal at the end be the putting-together of puzzle pieces from parts 1-4: I don't *get* the technobabble, and it cheapens the sacrifice. We live in a world where researchers have discovered how to extract vanilla flavouring from cow dung, where there are contact lens cameras, and *Jack Harkness* can't make a broadcast using alien-advanced audio technology that doesn't involve the wetware of a human voicebox? The show lost me there. Too much emotion used as whitewash for a plot that doesn't really stand on the legs it was given. *grumps*
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 09:49 am (UTC)And the Minister who suggested they be chosen according to social standing would probably be more blamed than most in the end, even though she might think she'd get away with it at the end of Day 5.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 03:23 am (UTC)And I simply cannot believe that Jack would have given up and used his grandson without calling the Doctor and asking for help. He's cold, but he's "last-resort" cold, and he would have been running through every option in his head before he volunteered Stephen. The Doctor isn't the kind of option one just forgets.
I know, I know. It's a different series, and if the Doctor's there to step in and fix every problem there wouldn't be any conflict, blah blah blah. But I really just can't believe that no one in the entire world would have thought to call the Doctor.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 11:03 am (UTC)However, the whole thread of the politicians was, I found, utterly compelling, the scene where the 10% are chosen, chilling and horribly credible.
And at the end of Ep 5, when we'd got our breath back, we had a very in-depth talk with my teenage son about David Kelly. Remember him.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 02:22 am (UTC)And, yes, at the end of the episode when they choose the 10% I was thinking, "The most amazing part of this series doesn't even have anything to do with the main cast. Wow."
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 11:44 am (UTC)I never really believed that Jack believed that. He's never struck me as a natural trade unionist.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 02:23 am (UTC)