While common sense tells me I should see Enchanted--it's a Disney movie, Menken songs, well-reviewed, likely to be seen by enough Disney fans that I will want to assimilate it into my reference knowledge--there's something about the premise that hits my squick buttons: the humiliating fish-out-of-water factor.
Watching someone flounder (no pun intended) in a situation completely unfamiliar to them--a situation so familiar to us, the audience, that it's meant to provoke laughs at the someone's expense--is hideous to me, makes me run out of the room crying. Whether the floundering is because the situation is merely alien to the individual, or because the individual has a mental handicap, I react the same way. It doesn't matter how well it's done, or how warm-heartedly it's meant.
I can't listen to people tell me how Being There is one of their favorite movies, or how Star Trek IV (the one with the whales and the time-travel) is the best film of the franchise. I wept fat howling tears over Pleasantville and The Jerk. Don't even think of asking me to see Elf. I especially--god, it's hard to talk about this trigger--will freak when someone is portrayed as being hungry but does not know how to go about getting food in their alien situation. Not because they're being denied it--watching someone starve because they're trapped or having food deliberately withheld is awful, but in a general "horror" sense--but because it's easily obtainable if they just knew how to get it. The idea that they might go hungry under those circumstances terrifies me.
Some people have tried to tell me I'm viewing these all wrong, that they're meant to be uplifting, to show how adversity can be met with innocence--I can't hear it, can't even listen to the defense without running away crying.
And it's because each time it's a situation the viewer's familiar with--our world, one we adapt in every day--that I'm sickened, struck by the humiliation. Stanislaw Lem wrote a book called Return From the Stars where an astronaut from our era returns to Earth far in the future, and refuses to spend precious time in re-orientation--he just chucks it and goes out into this unfamiliar world to acclimate as he goes. And that doesn't distress me, because our heads are with him, in his head--not in the heads of the people who see him and are puzzled at his ignorance. From his point of view, we move along with him and think he's doing pretty well, we're doing pretty well, for someone who doesn't know the rules and is feeling his way. Pleasantville doesn't bother me to watch the brother and sister try to function in the television fantasy world, because they're more knowledgeable than the people of the world into which they go. What gets me is when the rules of the fantasy world start breaking down, and the fantasy world inhabitants have no idea how to cope with the new rules as their world turns into ours.
(Forrest Gump doesn't bother me much, but that's just because it's dumb and I can't suspend my disbelief for any of it. About the time we got to the "I taught Elvis how to move" part I was gagging.)
So I may just have to read the synopsis on Enchanted and leave it at that.
Watching someone flounder (no pun intended) in a situation completely unfamiliar to them--a situation so familiar to us, the audience, that it's meant to provoke laughs at the someone's expense--is hideous to me, makes me run out of the room crying. Whether the floundering is because the situation is merely alien to the individual, or because the individual has a mental handicap, I react the same way. It doesn't matter how well it's done, or how warm-heartedly it's meant.
I can't listen to people tell me how Being There is one of their favorite movies, or how Star Trek IV (the one with the whales and the time-travel) is the best film of the franchise. I wept fat howling tears over Pleasantville and The Jerk. Don't even think of asking me to see Elf. I especially--god, it's hard to talk about this trigger--will freak when someone is portrayed as being hungry but does not know how to go about getting food in their alien situation. Not because they're being denied it--watching someone starve because they're trapped or having food deliberately withheld is awful, but in a general "horror" sense--but because it's easily obtainable if they just knew how to get it. The idea that they might go hungry under those circumstances terrifies me.
Some people have tried to tell me I'm viewing these all wrong, that they're meant to be uplifting, to show how adversity can be met with innocence--I can't hear it, can't even listen to the defense without running away crying.
And it's because each time it's a situation the viewer's familiar with--our world, one we adapt in every day--that I'm sickened, struck by the humiliation. Stanislaw Lem wrote a book called Return From the Stars where an astronaut from our era returns to Earth far in the future, and refuses to spend precious time in re-orientation--he just chucks it and goes out into this unfamiliar world to acclimate as he goes. And that doesn't distress me, because our heads are with him, in his head--not in the heads of the people who see him and are puzzled at his ignorance. From his point of view, we move along with him and think he's doing pretty well, we're doing pretty well, for someone who doesn't know the rules and is feeling his way. Pleasantville doesn't bother me to watch the brother and sister try to function in the television fantasy world, because they're more knowledgeable than the people of the world into which they go. What gets me is when the rules of the fantasy world start breaking down, and the fantasy world inhabitants have no idea how to cope with the new rules as their world turns into ours.
(Forrest Gump doesn't bother me much, but that's just because it's dumb and I can't suspend my disbelief for any of it. About the time we got to the "I taught Elvis how to move" part I was gagging.)
So I may just have to read the synopsis on Enchanted and leave it at that.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:30 pm (UTC)cringeworthy?
From:Re: cringeworthy?
From:Re: cringeworthy?
From:Re: cringeworthy?
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:08 pm (UTC):-/
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:16 pm (UTC)This was a really interesting and eye-opening read. And yes- probably sticking to the Enchanted synopsis is a good idea - from what I saw from the commercials, I now realize that Enchanted seems to be full of the fish-outta-water gags. *eep*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:17 pm (UTC)Time travel films where a character from the past or future ends up in our present often make me agitated at the humor. The beginning of Kate and Leopold, where the 19th century hero attempts to adjust to modern New York City, makes me nash my teeth at the dumb jokes made at his expense because he just doesn't know. As the story goes on and Leopold reveals that he's, you know, smart, I get more used to the idea.
During Pleasantville, I decided that the second half of the story was partially a metaphor for the 1950's and early 1960's, and was able to cope with the reactions of the townspeople much better.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:36 pm (UTC)And I do think Pleasantville's a really good movie, and I even like it in a way and recommend it, but I cannot think of it without threatening to cry all over again.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:27 pm (UTC)So, out of curiosity, are you saying, in that last part, if the person who is the fish out of water is okay with it--if it's being treated as an adventure?--that's okay; it's when it's being treated as puzzling-to-scary that it's not? Or does that matter? I'm just curious about how the frame is relevant to how it feels to you, about whether it matters that the person wanting the food is clearly thinking, huh, well, this must be easy enough, if I knew how, but I'm going to have to work it out, rather than, Hungry dammit need wah.
Me, I do okay with fish out of water in general, but have concluded my humiliation squick point is that I can watch something humiliating happen, but can't watch it happen again. That is, I watched The 40-Year Old Virgin, and it was fine and funny, but I can't watch it again and I know it. I run into this a LOT, where something I enjoyed once I just cannot watch or read again knowing what I know. I've concluded that somehow I'm good with suspending disbelief to the extent that I can pretend I think this isn't going to go to the humiliation place, but only the first time I see it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:44 pm (UTC)No, no, I'm saying that, in Return From the Stars, we are not seeing a figure lost in a situation with which we are comfortable--we are every bit as lost as he is. Everything is unfamiliar to us, as it is to him--when a woman takes him out for a snack that he's not familiar with, she shows him how to fold the thing up into a shape meant for eating, which he does. And we, the reader, didn't know how to do it either. We can't laugh at him for something we know how to do--that would be obvious to us--because it isn't obvious to us. We're in his shoes, not in the shoes of the person who's familiar with the territory, so it's not funny or meant to be held up as a joke to us "in the know" readers. It's all about the perspective of being lost.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:29 pm (UTC)I might see "Enchanted" though...just because it's a parody of Disney films and it's got Mencken music. I really miss Ashman a lot. :(
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:32 pm (UTC)I've come across other people who have this squick as well, so I don't think you're remotely alone. Matter of fact, I was just rereading White Noise and I was struck by how the younger girl has to leave the room when she sees anybody being humiliated or embarrassed on TV. It's not a bulletproof squick for me--Elf completely won me over, and I happen to love The Jerk to an embarrassing degree--but I do feel that aversion. It will make me squirm more than a horror flick.
I can't stand fic that portrays wizards (especially Severus) as consistently humiliating themselves in the Muggle world. It was bad enough when JKR did it; I don't need to see more, thanks. What astounds me is that in the wake of knowing that Severus is half-Muggle, grew up in the Muggle world, etc., I'm STILL seeing fic that portrays him as incompetent in the Muggle world, all for the sake of laughs.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:33 pm (UTC)Reading your description made me aware of a squick I've got for watching people getting cheated, framed, or swindled. The Shawshank Redemption is one of my favorite movies ever, but I can't watch the first part of it because I can't stand seeing Andy being hauled off to jail for something he didn't do. Another theme I can't bear to watch is comedies about people trying to get somewhere but being thwarted at every turn. Makes me want to rip out my hair.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:35 pm (UTC)It's something that's most recently come up for me in reading Supernatural fic because a lot of people take interactions between college-educated Sam and Dean, who lives out of his car, in that direction. Which makes it maybe a good thing that the show didn't do it for you.
(I totally cried the first time I saw Pleasantville, and it still makes me twitchy, but it seems much kinder than a lot of things in the genre. At least the kids understand the feeling of disorientation, instead of being either amused or disgusted by it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:59 pm (UTC)Oh man I don't think I could take Forrest Gump seriously because of all the crack. I, did, however cry at the end.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:46 pm (UTC)Though it is nice to know that I'm not the only person who gets embarassed for fictional characters. I just think, "Oh, God, don't do that, you're gonna humiliate yourself." And they do it anyway, and even if they aren't embarassed by their actions, I am. It's always annoying.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 07:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 08:08 pm (UTC)Here in Aus we had a TV series called Mother and Son about a middle aged son living with an elderly, and vaguely demented mother, and it always made me squirm becuase most of the 'humour' was about her odd behaviour, even though it was pitched as being about the son's cluelessness. Not quite the same genre but close.
I can't watch humour of humiliation. Actually, I don't see the humour quite apart from the aquirm factor.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:11 pm (UTC)(isn't ironic that I can watch anything about, say, bullying, and read extremely violent stuff for fun? it´s just this type of humiliation that turns me completely off).
Plus, they probably make fun of the songs. I liked the songs. I kinda wish Disney would do that again, instead of just having dialogues in the movies ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:11 pm (UTC)But this totally nails why I walked out of the Terminal--everyone told me it was hysterical, and touching, and all this stuff, and the first five minutes literally made me cry, because he didn't know what was going on. *shudders*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:36 pm (UTC)That is to say, it's really nothing like Elf.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 10:48 pm (UTC)My own emotional weakpoints as a viewer / reader are along similar lines. And don't ever ask me to go to a magic show or amateur stand up comedy night. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-12-05 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 10:52 pm (UTC)Well said, however. :)
I still kinda want to see it though, because James Marsden looks too cute in tights. XD
no subject
Date: 2007-12-05 04:02 pm (UTC)