Who needs sleep, anyway.
Aug. 9th, 2007 10:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So very behind in:
1. Replying to comments. (You guys are wonderfully articulate and I crave the dialogue, so, dammit, I still want to get to 'em.)
2. Setting up GreatestJournal, InsaneJournal, and JournalFen to be something beyond placeholders.
3. Making new icons. So many DH jokes to be played with!
4. Writing post-DH fic. Isn't that the most heinous of all? Plotbunnies should always be fed. Hey, how about this for a standard disclaimer in the future? "All characters in this story are fictional and thus have no age."
I still have DH meta to spring on you, though. Bits and pieces seems to be as good a method as any, so, here's one: Remember the film of Philospher's/Sorcerer's Stone? Do you think that Columbus and Kloves were told by Rowling, "Listen, you have to make sure Harry really does catch the Snitch in his mouth; it's important later"--or did they just get lucky in choosing to include that in the film?
1. Replying to comments. (You guys are wonderfully articulate and I crave the dialogue, so, dammit, I still want to get to 'em.)
2. Setting up GreatestJournal, InsaneJournal, and JournalFen to be something beyond placeholders.
3. Making new icons. So many DH jokes to be played with!
4. Writing post-DH fic. Isn't that the most heinous of all? Plotbunnies should always be fed. Hey, how about this for a standard disclaimer in the future? "All characters in this story are fictional and thus have no age."
I still have DH meta to spring on you, though. Bits and pieces seems to be as good a method as any, so, here's one: Remember the film of Philospher's/Sorcerer's Stone? Do you think that Columbus and Kloves were told by Rowling, "Listen, you have to make sure Harry really does catch the Snitch in his mouth; it's important later"--or did they just get lucky in choosing to include that in the film?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:50 am (UTC)*is all about the Grindlewald/Dumbledore*
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:52 am (UTC)And frankly, I wouldn't squick about a story of their youthful indescretions.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-14 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:47 am (UTC)That should be fandom's new motto.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:12 am (UTC)2. Setting up GreatestJournal, InsaneJournal, and JournalFen to be something beyond placeholders.
I have to do that too. Or at least change them from the hideous default layout.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:26 am (UTC)Jokes are always good, funny icons bloody brilliant!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:28 am (UTC)Ha, that'd be awesome if you started use it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:31 am (UTC)I don't know about this; if she were keeping an eye out on the movies, wouldn't she have insisted that Lily be in the "Snape's Worst Memory" scene on OotP? Her being left out is going to be a bit of a poser to work around when they film DH, won't it?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 04:32 am (UTC)If I'm remembering it completely wrong, please pretend I never said this. You see, I've only seen the movie once, so I fail as a fan. D:
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 06:15 am (UTC)So, yeah. Oops! :)
I suppose there's a way around it, but the Snape/Lily will be even more out of the blue in the 7th movie than it was in the 7th book.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 09:10 am (UTC)What I'm saying is that, in the Pensieve, Harry could see everything. With the Legilimency (again, assuming I'm remembering correctly), we just saw flashes, glimpses. So she could have been there, and we were just unable to see it because they didn't show much.
But you're right, it will come out of friggin' nowhere in the seventh movie.
And if I'm still not making sense, it's because it's 2 AM and I'm tired.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:47 am (UTC)Hee! I love that. Like, a lot. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 04:29 am (UTC)Also, the disclaimer is perfect, and I vote that everyone uses it in the future.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 05:40 am (UTC)(I've just friended you, something I should have done a long time ago. You've been my very favorite writer in the fandom for a couple of years now, but I'm a bit shy about saying things like that. :))
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 05:46 am (UTC)By the way, I'm sort of anticipating some Grindelwald/Dumbledore fic out of you. >>; Maybe a Grindelwald/Dumbledorebrothers angsty threesome!
Mmmm.
Or I can just go in a corner and imagine it myself. x)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 06:08 am (UTC)I love the new disclaimer!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 07:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 07:30 am (UTC)LOL, you're my hero!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 12:00 pm (UTC)Whatever you're writing, I can't wait to read it! And the meta. And see your new icons as well.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 02:56 pm (UTC)I just realized that I would love a St. George (since he's holey now) icon. Just sayin'. ;)
I can't believe it took me this long to notice that reference. And I am naively trying to ignore the new strikethroughs in the vain hope that they just go away. Blahh.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 07:26 pm (UTC)Where are you going on Greatest Journal? Are you going to crosspost or what?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-14 10:40 am (UTC)Please tell me that's on your agenda?