META: Did Snape know Draco's task?
Apr. 13th, 2007 11:31 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Little bit of meta here, my take on one question posed by the Spinner's End chapter of HBP: did Snape indeed know what Draco's task was when he claimed to Bellatrix and Narcissa he did? Here's what Snape says:
"It so happens that I know of the plan," he said in a low voice. "I am one of the few the Dark Lord has told."
Some readers have speculated that he might not have, that he was bluffing. If that's so, that means he didn't know exactly what he was signing up for when he agreed to make the Unbreakable Vow. Why would Snape have taken such a risk? Possibly because he didn't know Draco's task and figured he darn well needed to know what Voldemort was plotting, so, by telling Narcissa "It's all right, you can speak freely with me," he'd have the chance to find out something crucial.
I don't see anything in that chapter that directly contradicts that idea; Snape's hesitation before he says the last words of the vow could also be said to support it. Perhaps he hesitates because he has no idea what he's promising, but knows he can't back out at that point without having his bluff called. However, one can also explain the hesitation if Snape does know that Draco's been directed to kill Dumbledore, because Snape would realize that by doing so, he's signed his own death warrant, since he's thinking there's no way he'll carry it through.
I'm more inclined to think that Snape does actually know, even though we have no hard-and-fast evidence. What we do have, though, is what can be seen as a clean example of an author's contrivance to keep the knowledge from the reader, by shrouding the element in "we must not speak of it, the Dark Lord has commanded," and "I already know of the plan." Keeps the reader in the dark. And that's all the explanation you'd need, as to why he says that. I think that's the most compelling element to sway me in that direction. But I do think that the chapter, and all the rest of the text, can support either hypothesis.
"It so happens that I know of the plan," he said in a low voice. "I am one of the few the Dark Lord has told."
Some readers have speculated that he might not have, that he was bluffing. If that's so, that means he didn't know exactly what he was signing up for when he agreed to make the Unbreakable Vow. Why would Snape have taken such a risk? Possibly because he didn't know Draco's task and figured he darn well needed to know what Voldemort was plotting, so, by telling Narcissa "It's all right, you can speak freely with me," he'd have the chance to find out something crucial.
I don't see anything in that chapter that directly contradicts that idea; Snape's hesitation before he says the last words of the vow could also be said to support it. Perhaps he hesitates because he has no idea what he's promising, but knows he can't back out at that point without having his bluff called. However, one can also explain the hesitation if Snape does know that Draco's been directed to kill Dumbledore, because Snape would realize that by doing so, he's signed his own death warrant, since he's thinking there's no way he'll carry it through.
I'm more inclined to think that Snape does actually know, even though we have no hard-and-fast evidence. What we do have, though, is what can be seen as a clean example of an author's contrivance to keep the knowledge from the reader, by shrouding the element in "we must not speak of it, the Dark Lord has commanded," and "I already know of the plan." Keeps the reader in the dark. And that's all the explanation you'd need, as to why he says that. I think that's the most compelling element to sway me in that direction. But I do think that the chapter, and all the rest of the text, can support either hypothesis.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-14 05:33 pm (UTC)That sort of ties in with the thought I've always had, though -- as a general, Dumbledore was a lousy headmaster, and vice versa.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 01:18 pm (UTC)Let's look at that crazy scene in the girls' bathroom. Imagine if Harry and Draco weren't two boys with wands willing to cast violent spells, but instead had the analog weapons in their hands. Draco attempts to shoot Harry (Cruciatus) and Harry stabs Draco (sectumsempra.) In a real school, both boys have to face some kind of suspension or expulsion. At Hogwarts, Harry gets detention and everyone figures that Draco almost died so he's off the hook. Hello! You can't go around shooting and stabbing people.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 01:44 pm (UTC)But Snape doesn't seem to want to teach Harry anything, just to prove to Harry that he's wrong about this, that and the other thing.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 02:05 pm (UTC)I'm beginning to think more and more that part of Snape's task at Hogwarts was to make sure that Harry hated HIM above all others. That it's going to prove necessary in the end.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-17 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-20 06:15 pm (UTC)You could say that Lupin is more manipulative, and I think that's true. It's also true that Lupin puts a lot of energy into thinking about how to reach each student, at least each Gryffindor. Snape has the capacity to be an excellent teacher--his authority, his knowledge of and passion for his subjects--but he's too invested in being right where Harry is concerned.
This is a bit of a hobby horse with me, can you tell?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-18 12:19 am (UTC)In a real school, both boys would have been taking time *off* from school to attend their trials -- at some time in the future, at least - with (at their age) incarceration a serious possibility. In our burg, the state would press charges if nobody else did.