I read
atdelphi's The Ravenclaw Girl (Filch/Luna, NC-17) (look, it's another Filch pairing rec! What can I say. ^_^ ) and one of the things that tickled me most about this very funny story was Delphi's take on somnophilia. Which got me to thinking.
Somnophilia, which can broadly be defined as pleasure taken from sexual activity where one partner is sleeping, has a lot of permutations in fantasy. And I love some of those takes but others cross my line. Thing about somnophilia is, if one person is in a natural sleep state, eventually they're going to wake up if the activity gets too, well, active. For some people, I think part of the pleasure of the fantasy is imagining how far they can go before the sleeping person wakes. And I like that but I can't really write that into a story, because I reach a point where I no longer believe the person would still be asleep. Can't buy it.
On the other hand, some people might find the pleasure of the fantasy is that the sleeping person can feign sleep all through, enjoy it and be awake but pretend to stay asleep--be blameless, if you will. Problem I have with this is that I think it has to assume that both parties know they are conspirators in the act. The "sleeping" participant knows s/he's awake and the active participant has to know that too, but both of them are pretending they don't. Except that they do both know it. That kills it for me. The point of being "blameless" is lost for me in that one. I think that's not the point for those who do find this version of it sexy, mind--they think the "conspiracy" is part and parcel of the sexiness of the act. In fact, some might find it an important part, for if they couldn't think that both parties are enjoying themselves and know that both of them have consented to the act, they might not enjoy the fantasy at all, would consider it just another twist on rape (if that turns them off).
Some might conquer both of these problems by imagining a drugged sleeper, who will be sure not to wake. But this implies a few things: 1) Loss of spontanaeity and undeniably dark intentions. The whole "oh, I've just come across you sleeping" innocence is gone if the active participant actually drugged the sleeper. 2) Even if the active participant didn't do the drugging--if the sleeper perhaps took something to help him/her get to sleep, for example--if the active participant knows this, there's still something dark about it. 3) If we can feel assured the sleeper won't wake up because of drugs, that removes the whole "how far can I go before they wake?" excitement of the fantasy, if that's the part you like.
For some the enjoyment is in imagining the sleeper's verge-of-sleep stirrings and murmurs that never quite cross the line into wakefulness. For some it's being the sleeper, feeling what's happening but perhaps thinking it's just part of their dreams. Sometimes I'll imagine a drug so tailored that it lets me believe the sleeper could really stay under but still have those responses--the problem I have is believing such a drug could exist in the first place. Soon, I'm saying, "Gimme a break, that's not a drug, that's an effing potion." And that's fine if I'm imagining a magical universe, but it's laughable if I'm not.
You see how complicated this is?
So this is why somnophilia, in the flavors I enjoy it, often stays within the confines of a fleeting fantasy and why I don't try to fit it into an actual written story. My suspension of disbelief falls to pieces at every turn.
Which means, of course, I'm thinking hard about how to make it work in a story anyway.
Somnophilia, which can broadly be defined as pleasure taken from sexual activity where one partner is sleeping, has a lot of permutations in fantasy. And I love some of those takes but others cross my line. Thing about somnophilia is, if one person is in a natural sleep state, eventually they're going to wake up if the activity gets too, well, active. For some people, I think part of the pleasure of the fantasy is imagining how far they can go before the sleeping person wakes. And I like that but I can't really write that into a story, because I reach a point where I no longer believe the person would still be asleep. Can't buy it.
On the other hand, some people might find the pleasure of the fantasy is that the sleeping person can feign sleep all through, enjoy it and be awake but pretend to stay asleep--be blameless, if you will. Problem I have with this is that I think it has to assume that both parties know they are conspirators in the act. The "sleeping" participant knows s/he's awake and the active participant has to know that too, but both of them are pretending they don't. Except that they do both know it. That kills it for me. The point of being "blameless" is lost for me in that one. I think that's not the point for those who do find this version of it sexy, mind--they think the "conspiracy" is part and parcel of the sexiness of the act. In fact, some might find it an important part, for if they couldn't think that both parties are enjoying themselves and know that both of them have consented to the act, they might not enjoy the fantasy at all, would consider it just another twist on rape (if that turns them off).
Some might conquer both of these problems by imagining a drugged sleeper, who will be sure not to wake. But this implies a few things: 1) Loss of spontanaeity and undeniably dark intentions. The whole "oh, I've just come across you sleeping" innocence is gone if the active participant actually drugged the sleeper. 2) Even if the active participant didn't do the drugging--if the sleeper perhaps took something to help him/her get to sleep, for example--if the active participant knows this, there's still something dark about it. 3) If we can feel assured the sleeper won't wake up because of drugs, that removes the whole "how far can I go before they wake?" excitement of the fantasy, if that's the part you like.
For some the enjoyment is in imagining the sleeper's verge-of-sleep stirrings and murmurs that never quite cross the line into wakefulness. For some it's being the sleeper, feeling what's happening but perhaps thinking it's just part of their dreams. Sometimes I'll imagine a drug so tailored that it lets me believe the sleeper could really stay under but still have those responses--the problem I have is believing such a drug could exist in the first place. Soon, I'm saying, "Gimme a break, that's not a drug, that's an effing potion." And that's fine if I'm imagining a magical universe, but it's laughable if I'm not.
You see how complicated this is?
So this is why somnophilia, in the flavors I enjoy it, often stays within the confines of a fleeting fantasy and why I don't try to fit it into an actual written story. My suspension of disbelief falls to pieces at every turn.
Which means, of course, I'm thinking hard about how to make it work in a story anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 02:39 pm (UTC)It sure is complicated! Maybe a solution would be a good and slow preparation before starting with the sex, but that too would mean that the thing was planned.
Most of this kink's charme must be in this paradox. As for me, somnophilia is related to slowness, with holding back before the orgasm... mmm sexy!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 02:59 pm (UTC)I've been re-reading a book on the depiction of women in 1880s - 1920s art, called "Idols of Perversity". It has a huge section on the fetishization of sleeping/dead/drowned women, which were prevalent in art from that period. Women's sexuality was seen as being powerful and tending to overcome and consume men. So the Victorians divided women into evil/sexual/active or good/virtuous/nonsexual/passive. Only the latter were safe to be attracted to. And when is a woman most passive and virtuous? When dyingn (or dead) from unfulfilled (nonsexual) love. But it was considered inappropriate to be attracted to dead women, of course, so the artist played with the line and made paintings of women that could be seen as either dead or asleep.
I got the impression that death was seen as erotic because it embodies ultimate helplessness. So sleeping women were fetishized because the viewer could imagine that the woman was safely, virtuously dead, and therefore completely unable to exert influence on the man to do whatever evil, sexual women do, yet there was real no harm (or anything truly appropriate) because she was just asleep. Maybe it just boils down to a variation of a submission kink. . .
Anyway, hope that made a shred of sense. It's terribly complicated, and I'm sure I've botched it all up, but the book is truly fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 04:30 pm (UTC)Why not a combination of the above?
What if someone acts very subtle and gets away with it?
Or when the sleeper has been acting from the start fooling the other?
Or if the sleeper is ill and has a fever warm enough to sleep trough a lot?
Or the sleeper is too insecure / intimidated to do something about it and feigns sleep to avoid more trouble?
Or there's a spinning wheel and Harry turns seventeen but forgets to ask Snape for his party. :p
I really like somnophilia, I should make a fanart piece for it. :) Thanks for bringing it up.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 07:38 pm (UTC)If Lucius is handsome Prince Philip in that scenario, I am so there.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:36 pm (UTC)Ha, there's a bit of a twist on this that I'm working on!
And all of these are delicious. Bunny bunny bunny! Especially the Sleeping Beauty version, heh.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 05:11 pm (UTC)Someone who is afraid of being rejected tries to seduce the object of desire when he (the object) is asleep (say, reaches out to stroke genitals through trousers...). The idea being that, if the beloved wakes up aroused, he'll go with it in a sleepy state- his resistance will be down. It will not be coercion- just a way to make the object more approachable (especially in an "but I'm not gay!" situation). The danger, though, is that the person will wake up and be furious and insulting and doubly insulted because of the sneakiness...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 10:41 pm (UTC)That's my take on it, at least *coughs*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 11:04 pm (UTC)The main thing (and I've seen this in main-line romance novels, too) is that it often seems to be used in order to write a classic rape fantasy without having to treat it as a rape. Which is to say - I want either for the sleeper to have given at least implicit consent at some point while concious, or I want the story to acknowledge that it *wasn't* consensual.
Not that I have anything against bodice rippers. I just - if that's what you're writing, admit you're writing it, and deal with it. Being asleep doesn't give you any more (or less) right to fall in love with him after than being tumbled in the rye with a knife against your stays.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-07 11:05 pm (UTC)In any case -- if you write it, I'll read it.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 04:52 pm (UTC)I don't think I did. I don't think this is strictly somnophilia. I think it's worse and probably goes way beyond any squick boundaries but here it is (http://community.livejournal.com/holyperv/4552.html#cutid1) if you're so inclined.
/pimp
no subject
Date: 2006-07-08 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-09 03:17 pm (UTC)Awake while sleeping
Date: 2006-07-13 11:47 am (UTC)I can think of three times I've 'woken up' while sleeping but been too asleep to actually get up or even open my eyes and it's been caused by drugs (there's a fourth time but I can't remember why it happened).
1) Waking up from surgery I could here a woman and a man talking about me. I remember the woman saying I could probably be moved soon since it looked like I was waking up but it seemed like a long time before I could open my eyes. I couldn't speed up waking up even though I wanted to wake up. I can't remember if I was able to say anything or move.
2) I had to get what the nurse called a push of some medication because the drug they used to put me under made me feel sick. (It hurts, BTW, as it is injected into your IV.) I was able to talk when I half awoke from that drug induced sleep. I tried to ask my mom if the Fugees were on whatever she was watching on TV since I couldn't wake up enough to open my eyes and she thought I was talking in my sleep. I guess I was.
3) The third time I think I overdosed on Benadryl or I took a Benadryl after taking something else that causes drowsiness.
I think a somnophilia story could work if the person who's awake only touched the sleeping person and got off on what they imagined the sleeping person was dreaming about. I don't know if that's a cheat since sex wouldn't actually occur in the story but it could be believable.
Re: Awake while sleeping
Date: 2006-07-18 05:04 pm (UTC)Yeah, sex doesn't have to actually occur--you don't have to go all the way; sometimes just a forbidden touch or two can be made highly sexy in narrative or fantasy. Good point.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-22 12:56 am (UTC)Sleeping Beauty, anyone?
Date: 2006-07-29 10:54 pm (UTC)A creepy twist on the tale, sometimes, is the implication of necrophilia; the king/prince thinks Sleeping Beauty isn't under a sleeping spell, she's just dead. So it's perfectly okay.
In some versions, the girl awakes during the sex. In others, she wakes up when the king's long gone and she's giving birth to the children (usually twins) he impregnated her with. In others still, our heroine is out cold until one of her children attempts to nurse, and ends up sucking on her finger, thereby dislodging the poisoned needle. Magically comatose main character or not, you can see the implausibility of the somnophilia kink has a history.
All variations end with the princess uniting with the king. Sometimes he's already married to another woman, usually an ogre or, worse, a barren queen. The woman tries to kill the strange princess and the children because she is a Very Evil Queen, and, when found out, she's put to death. The princess then takes her rightful place as ruler, though I find her eagerness to marry the man who well, raped her one of the more disturbing things about the story.
Re: Sleeping Beauty, anyone?
Date: 2006-08-06 12:02 pm (UTC)Oh, man, in all my fairy tale reads, how did I miss that one? That's fabulous.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-07 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 04:02 pm (UTC)