I really detest that magazine in the first place--not on principle, but because I have no interest in the lives of celebrities. Let me have my artists without their real-life baggage interrupting my enjoyment of their art. I recognize that that makes me the weirdo.
you posted what i thought the other day when i saw that. the people behind me in line at the store bumped into me while i stared. ...then i saw the glossy teeth of the plastic bitches below (not that the men aren't plastic too) and realized.
if you are right, then they did it on purpose to sell magazines. which means the idea of george cloony and matthew mcconaughey naked in bed together sells magazines. to ordinary americans. whoa...
just what I was thinking. Happily. Last week on Wait Wait dont Tell Me (US National Public Radio funny news quiz show, availalbe as a free podcast here: http://www.npr.org/programs/waitwait/) they were making jokes about slashing Putin and Bush! I kid you not. The world IS changing.
I love doing that because anyone who finds that morally offensive is usually someone I don't like and whose horizons need broadening anyway. :D Yes, I know it's more complicated than that but right now I'm boiling it down that simply, yes I am.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 09:53 pm (UTC)And my initial reaction to that cover was exactly the same! I bet they did it intentionally. It's so obvious, really. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:01 pm (UTC)Wonder what's up with that - usually I jump on the tiniest possibility of slashy goodness.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:11 pm (UTC)lol. I'll fix it, I promise!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-29 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-30 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 11:39 pm (UTC)Yet another reason why I degrade myself reading tabloids.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-02 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 02:21 pm (UTC)