![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yes, I'm pretty upset at the suspension of
pornish_pixies--you can assume that as long as that name has a strike-through through it, I'm still upset about it. But. The suspension doesn't mesh with lj's Terms of Service, and I know that neither the mod nor most of its members plan to take this lying down. Go take a look at
femmequixotic's journal and her post here to see how things stand.
And it was just yesterday that
gmth posed the question that if one could go back to one's beginning in fandom and give one's younger self advice, what would one do, and my response was that I would tell myself not to panic when restrictedsection.org received its C & D letter, thinking that all NC-17 HP fanfiction was going to disappear from the web 4EVAH OMG. So I'm following that advice today, and not panicking. Restrictedsection.org did not disappear;
pornish_pixies may return if we raise enough of a voice. I'm going to see what I can do to help. (In between writing smut. Damn straight.)
Oh, and? I've never locked a thing in this journal; I do not plan to start now.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And it was just yesterday that
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Oh, and? I've never locked a thing in this journal; I do not plan to start now.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:44 am (UTC)Well, okay, like ten, but still.. for such a little fest, that's a lot!no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:32 am (UTC)Like mine? I'm being a bitch. :D
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:47 am (UTC)I've never been particularly interested in drawing chan, but something about this whole thing quite makes me want to. Except then I'd squick myself out... so I'll have to stick to reasonably-aged smut. It *does* make me want to post more smut :). (um, yeah, I got nervous and locked some stuff).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 03:17 am (UTC)I saw a film you might or might not like. There's a sad lack of gratuitous sex scenes, but the main character looks distractingly like Harry Potter.
http://www.outtakes.org.nz/2007/surveillance.html
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 11:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:09 am (UTC)Wait, have we got one of those around here somewhere? Because I could have sworn that one was being used for something different.
I want my own righteous flag of freedom to march under. I'm not panicking, but I think I did the CYA thing okay. And I do like waving flags.
Hopefully, it'll smooth over, but in either case, I'm not happy. I'm very pleased to know people are ready to stand up for themselves, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:30 am (UTC)Amen. Me, either.
And I just had this icon made special, in protest.
I want my damned PP!!!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:31 am (UTC)I was thinking about Gina's post too.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:02 am (UTC)WORD. You and me both. I just made a RARR!post about this, actually. :D I did check my interests with the intent of weeding out any "illegal" ones, but since I didn't actually have any in there (could've sworn I did!), nothing's changed after all. I'm very upset about
And frankly, I don't see the POINT in locking everything. There's a warning in my info, and I tend to say something in the actual rec if there's something particularly disturbing involved. That's reasonable. If someone runs into something un-innocent, they can't claim I didn't take reasonable precautions to keep 'em from it, and locking it all up under friends-only clearance isn't going to make it any "safer."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 11:41 am (UTC)Exactly!!! Why don't they get it?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:35 pm (UTC)*hugs* Thank you for chiming in. It means a lot!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 11:00 am (UTC)I am pretty pissed about pornish_pixies, cuz that's where all the good stuff got posted. Hopefully they just make it again and ignore the silly LJ baddies.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:38 pm (UTC)You're right, p_p can reform in a new form, but for lj to delete all that content is a crime of Chaos over Order. It's not right.
*taps knuckles against yours in Wonder Twin Power solidarity*
Barak Berkowitz responded to me!
Date: 2007-05-31 12:40 am (UTC)Re: Barak Berkowitz responded to me!
Date: 2007-05-31 12:47 am (UTC)Except apology is not enough. I expect reinstatement.
Maybe, just maybe, apology is code for "we will make amends by unsuspending the account but we aren't going to say that here because we don't want to be swamped with demands from everyone to unsuspend their accounts, because we're only going to do that on a very careful basis." Maybe.
And I should say to you: thank you for being so thorough and so rational/calm on this issue even when you (like the rest of us) are clearly angry about it.
Re: Barak Berkowitz responded to me!
From: