Romance and HP
Jul. 25th, 2005 09:59 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Someone brought this up in a thread somewhere, and I'm starting to subscribe to it too. Has to do with JKR and romance.
Yes, says Rowling, it was always going to be Ron/Hermione; she thought it was plain. Yes, she says, she always planned for Harry and Ginny to "come together and then part." The hints were there.
The hints, however, are the same sort of hints as introducing Polyjuice potion in CoS, and having it play a vital role in GoF. Of having the Trio muse that they haven't seen Kreacher around much over Christmas holidays. Of Scabbers missing a toe. They're plotty hints but not emotional development.
Harry/Ginny is plot but not romance. They're are hints that they'd fit together, like other plot elements in JKR's books, and through book 6 you see, as you do with Ron & Hermione, not the why of the falling in love, not the attraction, but the how of the "how will they get together?" As romance it falls flat, if one's looking for a romantic read. Which I may have been, but so were a lot of others.
If the Harry Potter series were a romance, Harry/Hermione would make the most sense--Hermione is the main female character; she's the only one who's had enough to development for a romance-type reader to think she's worthy of the main male character's interest. This, I think, is where the Harry/Hermione 'shippers (me included) are stumbling about in bewilderment trying to understand why everyone else (JKR included) are telling them the clues all went the other way. If you expect romance as emotional fulfillment and not mere plot, then you're not looking for clues; you're looking for the moments of emotional connection between characters. Harry's had plenty of those with Hermione, I don't think anyone will argue--she's his best female friend. He's not had any of those with Ginny. I really don't think he had any of those with Ginny even in HBP. He had a sudden teenage explosion of noticing her, and yes, I do understand that that's how teen romance happens, but it makes sense from a "this is how things happen" plot sense, to me, and not because of any character development.
This is why we're also asked to buy the Remus/Tonks. As plot, it works fine, and I actually can buy Remus/Tonks far more easily because this is not a relationship we would have expected to see crafted with any more detail than it was, simply because our protagonist was not in a position to see it. But is it asking too much that we get a greater emotional development of the romances that occurred right before Harry's eyes--including his own?
Harry/Ginny feels as distant to me as James/Lily. I was told about it, but never asked to feel it. In fact, I think Harry/Ginny might be Harry's answer to why James/Lily. He puzzles it out, asking Sirius and Remus how his parents could ever have got together; clearly Lily hated James at one time. And he's told that when James stopped being a prat, it blossomed. Similarly, when Ginny stops being a tongue-tied shy thing, Harry starts taking notice, and one day, brrdoom. Just like that, Harry. Doesn't have to be more complicated.
Only I kind of wish it was.
A concession, however: JKR emphasized "come together and part." Does she mean them to be parted for good? If so, perhaps she thought making this anything deeper than Harry's first girlfriend (Cho's not his first girlfriend, she's his first crush) would be wrong, to ask the reader to make that much emotional investment.
I liked
millefiori's reaction to this issue: "I need to step back and remind myself that I'm a character-driven reader in love with the story of a plot-driven writer. My characterization fix is going to have to come from fandom." Best reason for fanfic I've heard in a long time. (Even more than the smut. ^_^)
Yes, says Rowling, it was always going to be Ron/Hermione; she thought it was plain. Yes, she says, she always planned for Harry and Ginny to "come together and then part." The hints were there.
The hints, however, are the same sort of hints as introducing Polyjuice potion in CoS, and having it play a vital role in GoF. Of having the Trio muse that they haven't seen Kreacher around much over Christmas holidays. Of Scabbers missing a toe. They're plotty hints but not emotional development.
Harry/Ginny is plot but not romance. They're are hints that they'd fit together, like other plot elements in JKR's books, and through book 6 you see, as you do with Ron & Hermione, not the why of the falling in love, not the attraction, but the how of the "how will they get together?" As romance it falls flat, if one's looking for a romantic read. Which I may have been, but so were a lot of others.
If the Harry Potter series were a romance, Harry/Hermione would make the most sense--Hermione is the main female character; she's the only one who's had enough to development for a romance-type reader to think she's worthy of the main male character's interest. This, I think, is where the Harry/Hermione 'shippers (me included) are stumbling about in bewilderment trying to understand why everyone else (JKR included) are telling them the clues all went the other way. If you expect romance as emotional fulfillment and not mere plot, then you're not looking for clues; you're looking for the moments of emotional connection between characters. Harry's had plenty of those with Hermione, I don't think anyone will argue--she's his best female friend. He's not had any of those with Ginny. I really don't think he had any of those with Ginny even in HBP. He had a sudden teenage explosion of noticing her, and yes, I do understand that that's how teen romance happens, but it makes sense from a "this is how things happen" plot sense, to me, and not because of any character development.
This is why we're also asked to buy the Remus/Tonks. As plot, it works fine, and I actually can buy Remus/Tonks far more easily because this is not a relationship we would have expected to see crafted with any more detail than it was, simply because our protagonist was not in a position to see it. But is it asking too much that we get a greater emotional development of the romances that occurred right before Harry's eyes--including his own?
Harry/Ginny feels as distant to me as James/Lily. I was told about it, but never asked to feel it. In fact, I think Harry/Ginny might be Harry's answer to why James/Lily. He puzzles it out, asking Sirius and Remus how his parents could ever have got together; clearly Lily hated James at one time. And he's told that when James stopped being a prat, it blossomed. Similarly, when Ginny stops being a tongue-tied shy thing, Harry starts taking notice, and one day, brrdoom. Just like that, Harry. Doesn't have to be more complicated.
Only I kind of wish it was.
A concession, however: JKR emphasized "come together and part." Does she mean them to be parted for good? If so, perhaps she thought making this anything deeper than Harry's first girlfriend (Cho's not his first girlfriend, she's his first crush) would be wrong, to ask the reader to make that much emotional investment.
I liked
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:16 pm (UTC)I still think she's overlooking a stellar possibility of having Harry pick up Hermione's broken pieces after her beloved Ron dies in the next book. That's what I would have done with it.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:42 pm (UTC)I wonder if Harry/Ginny will translate better onscreen?
And post-Ron's-death!Harry/Hermione is perfect fanfiction fodder. Would be for canon, too, iffen she'd wanted.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:18 pm (UTC)Holy frickin' WORD. That's exactly how I felt last night when I was feeling so furious with the Ginny-hatred, because I want to like Ginny (and not H/G, mind), but my love of Ginny really needs to come more from fic than from the books. Reluctantly so, but if it must be, it must be.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:19 pm (UTC)We're conditioned to see "close friend of the opposite sex" become girlfriend/boyfriend, but, as Harry noted, that changes the relationship, and not always positively. It also reinforces the idea that boys and girls can't be friends. So, Hermione/Ron isn't great, either, but since the main thing in these books is how they relate to Harry, it could be worse.
I'm a slasher, so I'm not invested in any ship, and I admit to not liking Harry paired with anyone.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Bingo!
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:16 pm (UTC)Oh, that's very nicely put. I need to keep that idea in the forefront, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:44 pm (UTC)THANK YOU!! I'm not a 'shipper,' per se, but OH MY GOD the Harry/Ginny is so dull I couldn't cut butter with it!
This is exactly, exactly the way I feel about this issue! ...only you're more eloquent. By, like, 1,000x...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:08 pm (UTC)Eee, that so needs iconing. "Harry/Ginnnnyawwwnnn."
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:45 pm (UTC)"I need to step back and remind myself that I'm a character-driven reader in love with the story of a plot-driven writer. My characterization fix is going to have to come from fandom."
*flail* Word.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:09 pm (UTC)I'm rambling...
From:Re: I'm rambling...
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:47 pm (UTC)Holy shit, he does suffer from Oedipus syndrom then! ;P Seriously though, if that's his method of figuring out things he doesn't know, or solving puzzles, I'm really not surprised about his heavy-handedness when dealing with the whole Malfoy issue. I mean, he was one step short of bashing his head in the Room of Requirement's door space in order to get in! I guess that's where JKR sort of takes the piss on him. ;)
The hints, however, are the same sort of hints as introducing Polyjuice potion in CoS, and having it play a vital role in GoF. Of having the Trio muse that they haven't seen Kreacher around much over Christmas holidays. Of Scabbers missing a toe. They're plotty hints but not emotional development.
And that is JKR's main problem, I think. This reminds me of something Cate Blanchett once said about her works in college. She said her professors didn't understand the pattern of her logic, but she did. To make an awful paraphrase, JKR fails to understand that when she writes romance in her books, she sees it as plot. Her readers aren't satisfied though, because they need more than that.
Someone said in one of the discussions around here that the Harry Potter books are wonderfully filled with gaps that fandom takes great joy in filling. I guess that needing to flesh out the romance too is another gap, surprising as it is.
Cho's not his first girlfriend, she's his first crush
In continuation to what I've said, I have to say that while reading PoA (prior to my joining fandom), I really didn't care about what happened between Harry and Cho. And I was 16, I think, so yeah, you can count on my hormones to letch on any bit of smut they could find. However, I'd never come to connect this series with hormones until I joined fandom. Meh.
Also, I'm with you there on the Harry/Hermione point. It's not a ship I love from reading it an awful lot (because pete knows I don't), but to me it feels right, and certainly more "right" than Harry/Ginny. There is so much interaction to base a relationship upon. On that level, you could place Harry's obssession with Draco Malfoy on the same level as Harry/Ginny, because it's instinctive, not calculated. It's gut feeling Harry follows. So much for scaly monsters. (did you notice how I managed to make H/D sound like H/G? I am a genious >:D)
*smooch*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:14 pm (UTC)Someone said in one of the discussions around here that the Harry Potter books are wonderfully filled with gaps that fandom takes great joy in filling. I guess that needing to flesh out the romance too is another gap, surprising as it is.
Y'know what? Fanficwriters who didn't like Harry/Ginny (me included) should be challenged to flesh out the Harry/Ginny. I wouldn't WANT to, but that would be the point. ^_^
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:48 pm (UTC)I was saying to someone recently that if the R/Hr hints were "anvil-sized", as JKR recently said, then I feel pretty damn comfortable stating definitively that Draco/Pansy HAS SAILED, heh! But, as that person also aptly pointed out, anvils are kind of small, actually . . .
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:50 pm (UTC)Or for Ron.no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:22 pm (UTC)I also find it sad that some of the niftiest characters show up in her books and then have to go by the wayside. Anyone else sad that Karkaroff got offed so, well, off-handedly?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:08 pm (UTC)girl likes hero
hero doesn't notice
girl ceases to flaunt her deep and unabating love to god and country and moves on (preferably to close mate and/or dorm mate of hero)
hero notices slight and says, 'hey, wtf? she's pretty cute.'
now, hero likes girl too.
a chase must ensue, ending with hero getting the girl. why? he's the fucking hero, that's why.
and i have to ask, how do you pronounce your name? i pronounce it as "i'm a nuisance"....which is not meant as an aspersion on your character in the least.
and i dunno, i'm in love with fanfic for the smut.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:31 pm (UTC)The pseudonym (it's a real word) is pronounced "uh-MAN-you-EN-sis," and it means secretary or scribe. But if I'm ever parodied I want "I'm a nuisance" to be my parody name!
And I embrace you for lovin' the smut. It keeps coming back to that for me too.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 04:42 pm (UTC)