It really does depend on how one reads the article! Me, I saw a mundane coming to the convention and realizing that such obsession does lurk within the hearts of normal-appearing people, which must by definition make that normal too. That's the tone I got. I'm hearing a lot of people seeing it from other perspectives, though, and I wonder if being a journalist oneself puts one in either camp, reading this?

The disclosure of names, okay, that's really not on. That upsets me.