amanuensis1 (
amanuensis1) wrote2006-07-13 06:40 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Non-spoilery thoughts on POTC2
Saw POTC2; well, there's something to be said for not getting one's hopes too high, because from all the so-so reviews, I was expecting disappointment. NOT disappointed. Am suprisingly delighted at how not-disappointing it was!
I was worried we'd lose the characters a la the Matrix sequels, which, as you'll recall, went for joyless personless action sequences and straight into dullsville for two movies. And though there were action sequences to beat the band in POTC2, each one maintained the characters and dialogue and humor throughout each; there's your difference. Sure, it was aiming for a bit of over-the-top; sure, the storylines got convoluted enough to be confusing. But I felt like this film simply ramped up from where it left off, knowing the viewers knew Sparrow and Will and Elizabeth already and didn't need to see them established all over again, just--here's what's key--as long as they kept the characters doin' the stuff that made us love 'em. Which they did. Sparrow flounced, Will hero'ed, Elizabeth refused to be a damsel-in-distress. And they all stayed cool. Fun stuff.
I know I was the only one in my theatre who said, "It's Paolo from AbFab!" but surely I wasn't the only on my flist?
(Everyone has my permission to get spoilery in the comments, so be advised.)
I was worried we'd lose the characters a la the Matrix sequels, which, as you'll recall, went for joyless personless action sequences and straight into dullsville for two movies. And though there were action sequences to beat the band in POTC2, each one maintained the characters and dialogue and humor throughout each; there's your difference. Sure, it was aiming for a bit of over-the-top; sure, the storylines got convoluted enough to be confusing. But I felt like this film simply ramped up from where it left off, knowing the viewers knew Sparrow and Will and Elizabeth already and didn't need to see them established all over again, just--here's what's key--as long as they kept the characters doin' the stuff that made us love 'em. Which they did. Sparrow flounced, Will hero'ed, Elizabeth refused to be a damsel-in-distress. And they all stayed cool. Fun stuff.
I know I was the only one in my theatre who said, "It's Paolo from AbFab!" but surely I wasn't the only on my flist?
(Everyone has my permission to get spoilery in the comments, so be advised.)
no subject
Please, please tell me you found Norrington positively scrummy.
Though I do have some problem with Sparrow's characterization in this one -- he didn't seem quite the fellow who would have leaped into the water to save Elizabeth in POTC1. And his great moment of heroism, that Elizabeth "salutes" him for? Actually returning to his ship to do what he shoulda done in the first place? Not very satisfying. But probably they are saving his Big Moment up for the third one.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
But didn't you just love all those 'out there' slashy comments?
"What do you want, Lad?"
"I'm here to find the man I love."
*eyes widen*
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I didn't say that, but I did have a flashback everytime the little midget appeared to that time in The Surreal Life where he basically went into solotary drunken heat. Good times, man.
you know you can't read
(no subject)
no subject
I have a couple sort-of complaints. I wish we had learned *more* about the characters. That Jack has a shoe fetish or Elizabeth has a friend. And I was sad that so many of the jokes were recycled from the previous movie. They've lost all their zing for me, possibly because I've seen PotC about, um, 15 times. There were some new ones that made me go "BWAH!" but that's not much compared to the near-incessant giggling and grinning during my first few viewings of PotC.
And speaking of "BWAH!" -- I was looking through your icons for no particular reason, and this one (http://www.livejournal.com/userpic/38032540/955565).... BWAH!
(no subject)
no subject
Apart from that, the film was good :D.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Also, Norrington=YUM.
(got here from epicyclical, BTW)
~Relaynie
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2006-07-20 04:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)